TOEIC Writing Test Questions 6-8: Strong vs Weak Replies
TOEIC Writing Questions 6-8: strong and weak replies to 3 emails, two 300+ word model opinion essays and the official scoring criteria.
Lume Test
|
Oct 27, 2026
•
5 min read

Key Takeaways
- TOEIC Writing Questions 6-8: strong and weak replies to 3 emails, two 300+ word model opinion essays and the official scoring criteria.
Succeeding in the advanced sections of the toeic writing test requires more than basic grammatical accuracy; it demands prompt adherence, functional workplace register, and sustained argument development. This comprehensive guide breaks down Questions 6 through 8, providing side-by-side comparative analyses of strong versus weak responses for three email tasks, followed by complete 300+ word model opinion essays with paragraph-by-paragraph planning frameworks.

|
Want to FINALLY Ace the TOEIC Test And Reach Your Goals? Get Your FREE Lume Account Today to Unlock… ✅ 10,000+ PRACTICE QUESTIONS with detailed answers ✅ FREE MOCK TESTS with fast & accurate AI scoring ✅ Get BETTER SCORES with a PERSONALIZED study plan (Limited seats available!) |
Questions 6-8 at a Glance
Questions 6 through 8 of the TOEIC Writing Test test your proficiency in writing responses to requests and expressing opinions on certain issues. For Questions 1-5, you need to compose sentences from pictures; however, for Questions 6-7, you will be asked to write emails, while in Question 8, you will write an essay about an opinion.
TOEIC Writing Questions 6-8: Format and Timing
| Question | Task | Time Allowed | Scoring Scale | Primary Evaluation Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Question 6 | Respond to a Written Request | 10 minutes | 0–4 | Sentence quality and variety, vocabulary, organization |
| Question 7 | Respond to a Written Request | 10 minutes | 0–4 | Sentence quality and variety, vocabulary, organization |
| Question 8 | Write an Opinion Essay | 30 minutes | 0–5 | Support for the opinion, grammar, vocabulary, organization |
Questions 6-7: Respond to a Written Request
You have 10 minutes for each email response, including reading the prompt and writing your answer. Your response is evaluated on the quality and variety of your sentences, vocabulary, and organization.
ETS confirms that once you begin Question 7, you cannot return to Question 6. Therefore, manage each response within its own allotted time rather than relying on unused time from the previous task.
Question 8: Write an Opinion Essay
You have 30 minutes to write an essay in response to a question asking you to state, explain, and support your opinion.
ETS has clearly mentioned that a good essay contains at least 300 words. Try to write your essay in such a way that it has at least 300 words, including a good opinion, some relevant reasons, and examples. It must not be considered as a fixed standard for scoring because essay quality can also be judged on the basis of other criteria.
The Incoming Prompt
From: Marcus Vance (Apt. 4B, Greenfield Court)
To: Property Management Office
Date: October 14, 2026
Subject: Scheduled plumbing maintenance this Thursday
Dear Management Office,
I received a flyer stating that plumbers will be entering all odd- and even-numbered apartments along the B-wing this Thursday between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to inspect the main water valves. I work from home and take confidential client calls throughout the day.
Could you confirm whether my presence is strictly required during this inspection and how long the technicians plan to remain inside my unit?
Sincerely,
Marcus Vance
Directions: Respond to the email as the property manager. In your email, ask TWO questions and make ONE request.
Model Response
Dear Mr. Vance,
Thank you for contacting us about the plumbing inspection scheduled for Thursday, October 15. We understand that you need to maintain privacy during your confidential client calls.
You do not necessarily need to remain inside your apartment throughout the inspection. However, access arrangements must be confirmed with our management office in advance. The inspection is expected to take approximately 20 minutes per unit, although the actual duration may vary depending on the condition of the plumbing system.
To help us coordinate the visit, which hours of the day are you most likely to have confidential client calls? Also, are there any pets or other access-related considerations our maintenance team should know about?
Please reply by 5:00 p.m. today to confirm whether you authorize the maintenance team to enter your apartment during the scheduled inspection window. This will help us coordinate access arrangements and minimize disruption to your work.
Thank you for your cooperation. Please contact us if you have any further concerns.
Best regards,
Leah Morrison
Greenfield Court Management Office
Weaker Contrast Response
Dear Marcus,
I got your email about the plumbing inspection on Thursday. The plumbers will probably stay for about 20 minutes, so it should not take too long.
Are you going to be home all day, or will you go out for lunch? What time do you usually finish work? We will try to arrange something convenient for you.
Please do not worry too much about the inspection.
Best regards,
Leah Morrison
Comparative Analysis: Why One Response Is Stronger
- Task fulfilment: The model response includes two relevant questions and one explicit request. The weaker response asks two questions but makes no clear request.
- Relevance: The model response addresses privacy and apartment access, while the weaker response asks less useful questions about lunch and finishing time.
- Professional tone: “Dear Mr. Vance” and polite, direct language suit a property-management email better than casual phrases such as “I got your email.”
- Clarity: The model response gives an estimated inspection time and explains access arrangements without making unsupported promises.
Email 2: Supplier Proposes a Price Change
Business-to-business correspondence tests your ability to express commercial concerns, negotiate terms, and balance firmness with courtesy.
The Incoming Prompt
From: David Sterling, Regional Sales Director, Apex Packaging Solutions
To: Karen Patel, Procurement Lead, Lumina Cosmetics
Date: October 19, 2026
Subject: Notification of Revised Packaging Supply Rates
Dear Ms. Patel,
Due to significant increases in raw paperboard costs and maritime shipping surcharges over the past three quarters, Apex Packaging Solutions must adjust its commercial price list. Beginning December 1, unit prices across all bespoke cosmetic boxes will increase by 8.5%.
We value our multi-year collaboration with Lumina Cosmetics and want to ensure our revised rate structure continues to align with your production schedule for the upcoming fiscal quarter.
Sincerely,
David Sterling
Directions: Respond to the email as Karen Patel. In your email, state one objection or concern regarding the price increase, propose an alternative solution, and request a meeting.
Model Response
Dear Mr. Sterling,
Thank you for informing us of the upcoming price adjustment for our cosmetic packaging materials.
While we understand the rising costs affecting the packaging industry, an 8.5% increase would put considerable pressure on our budget for the upcoming quarter. Our product prices have already been agreed upon with our retail distributors, making it difficult to absorb such a significant increase without affecting our profit margins.
As an alternative, we propose maintaining our current unit prices through January 31 in exchange for a commitment to increase our order volume by 15% over the following year. This arrangement would provide Apex with more predictable demand while giving Lumina additional time to adjust its pricing strategy.
Could we schedule a virtual meeting on Thursday, October 22, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time to discuss this proposal? We value our partnership and hope to find a solution that works for both companies.
Sincerely,
Karen Patel
Procurement Lead, Lumina Cosmetics
Weaker Contrast Response
Hi David,
I received your email about raising prices by 8.5%. That is too high for our company because our budget is already tight, and our product prices have been set for the upcoming quarter.
Maybe you can give us a discount if we buy more products from you. We have been doing business for a long time, so we hope you can help us with this problem.
Let’s meet sometime next week to talk about the price increase. Let me know when you are free.
Thanks,
Karen
Comparative Analysis: Why One Response Is Stronger
- Professional tone: The model explains the budget concern diplomatically, while the weaker response relies on informal wording such as “That is too high.”
- Concrete alternative: The model proposes a price freeze in exchange for a specific increase in order volume. The weaker response asks for a discount without defining the terms.
- Clear meeting request: The model suggests a specific date and time, while the weaker response vaguely proposes meeting “sometime next week.”
- Business reasoning: The model explains how the price increase affects existing commitments and offers a potential benefit to both companies. The weaker response relies mainly on the length of the business relationship.
Email 3: A Colleague Asks for Event Suggestions
Colleague-to-colleague correspondence in the TOEIC Writing Test requires a professional yet approachable tone. A strong response should address the requested points directly, explain each recommendation, and ask a relevant question about the event’s budget or logistics.
The Incoming Prompt
From: Julian Thorne, Internal Communications Manager
To: Cross-Department Working Group
Date: October 20, 2026
Subject: Ideas for the Annual Departmental Innovation Retreat
Team,
We are in the preliminary stages of organizing our annual two-day offsite innovation retreat for the product engineering and design divisions, scheduled for mid-November. Our primary objective this year is to foster interdepartmental collaboration while brainstorming product enhancements for 2027.
To ensure the agenda meets everyone’s expectations, I welcome your input. Please suggest two distinct team activities we should consider incorporating and explain how each supports our goals.
Warm regards,
Julian
Directions: Respond to Julian’s email. In your email, recommend TWO activities, provide a justification for each, and ask ONE question regarding the budget or logistics.
Model Response
Hi Julian,
Thanks for coordinating this year’s innovation retreat. I think we can make the event both productive and engaging by including activities that encourage collaboration between the engineering and design teams.
First, I recommend a cross-functional rapid-prototyping workshop in which engineers and designers work in small groups to develop concepts for new product features. This would help participants combine their technical knowledge with user-centered design ideas and generate practical suggestions for 2027.
Second, we could organize a product improvement session where team members review previous product launches, identify challenges, and suggest solutions together. This activity would encourage departments to share lessons learned and identify opportunities to improve our products and workflows.
Could you let us know whether the retreat budget includes funding for external workshop facilitators, or should we plan to lead both activities internally?
I look forward to hearing your thoughts and helping finalize the agenda.
Best regards,
Maya Lin
Senior UX Strategist
Weaker Contrast Response
Hello Julian,
I have some ideas for our retreat in November. We can do several fun activities to help everyone relax and get along better.
First, we could play outdoor sports such as soccer or volleyball. These games are good for our health, and people can have fun together when the weather is nice. Second, we could go to a restaurant for dinner. Sharing good food would help everyone become better friends.
Also, how much money can we spend on the retreat? Please let me know soon so I can think of more ideas.
Bye,
Maya
Comparative Analysis: Why One Response Is Stronger
- Relevance: The model recommends activities directly related to cross-departmental collaboration and product improvement, while the weaker response focuses mainly on recreation.
- Justification: Each model recommendation includes a clear explanation of how it supports the retreat’s objectives. The weaker response gives general benefits without connecting them to the stated goals.
- Professional tone: The model uses a friendly but workplace-appropriate tone. “Bye” is more casual than the sign-off expected in this context.
- Task fulfilment: The model recommends two activities, justifies both, and asks one specific logistics question. The weaker response includes two activities and a budget question, but its justifications are less relevant to the prompt.
Opinion Essay 1: Should Companies Require Staff to Work in the Office?
Task 8 is the last assignment for the TOEIC Writing Test. In thirty minutes, you are required to organize your ideas, write, and edit an essay on your position. According to ETS, an effective essay should include no less than 300 words. If you want to produce a good response, concentrate on the following aspects: position, arguments, examples, and organization instead of vocabulary.
The Prompt
Question 8:
Some organizations believe that requiring employees to work in the office full-time improves productivity and teamwork. Others argue that offering flexible or remote working options produces better results.
Which work arrangement do you believe is more beneficial for companies? Support your position with specific reasons and examples.
Strategic Brainstorming and Paragraph Plan
Spend approximately 3-5 minutes outlining your position and main supporting points before drafting.
Position: Flexible working arrangements are generally more beneficial than mandatory full-time office attendance.
| Paragraph | Main purpose | Supporting ideas |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Introduction | Introduce the debate and state your position | Flexibility can improve productivity and reduce operating costs |
| 2. Body 1 | Explain the productivity benefits | Less commuting, fewer interruptions, better concentration |
| 3. Body 2 | Explain the business benefits | Lower office expenses and access to a wider talent pool |
| 4. Counterargument | Address concerns about collaboration | Use digital tools and schedule purposeful in-person meetings |
| 5. Conclusion | Summarize the argument | Adopt flexible policies based on job responsibilities |
Model Essay (300+ Words)
Should Companies Require Staff to Work in the Office?
As technology continues to change the way people communicate and collaborate, companies are reconsidering whether employees need to work in the office every day. Although working on-site can support teamwork, I believe flexible working arrangements are generally more beneficial because they can improve individual productivity and help companies manage their operating costs.
First, flexible working arrangements can create a better environment for concentration and improve employees’ work-life balance. Commuting can consume considerable time, particularly for people who live far from their workplaces. By working remotely, employees can use this time for rest or personal responsibilities, which may help them feel less stressed and more focused during working hours. In addition, some tasks require sustained concentration that can be difficult to maintain in a busy office. For example, a software developer working on a complex technical problem may complete the task more efficiently in a quiet home environment with fewer interruptions. Although remote work does not guarantee higher productivity for everyone, giving employees more control over their working conditions can help them perform at their best.
Second, flexible work policies can help companies reduce certain expenses and recruit suitable candidates from a wider geographical area. Organizations that require every employee to attend the office daily may need larger premises, more workstations, and additional resources for utilities and maintenance. Allowing some employees to work remotely can reduce these requirements, enabling companies to invest more in employee training or product development. Furthermore, employers can consider applicants who live outside the immediate commuting area rather than limiting recruitment to people who can travel to the office every day. This can be particularly useful when hiring professionals with specialized skills.
Admittedly, remote work can make communication and teamwork more challenging, especially when employees need to solve complicated problems together. However, companies can address these difficulties through regular team meetings, shared project-management platforms, and scheduled in-person workshops. A hybrid arrangement can also provide opportunities for face-to-face collaboration without requiring everyone to commute five days a week.
In conclusion, I believe flexible working arrangements are generally more beneficial than mandatory full-time office attendance. They can support employee concentration, reduce some business expenses, and expand recruitment opportunities. Rather than applying the same policy to every position, companies should choose working arrangements that reflect their employees’ responsibilities and collaboration needs.
Margin Notes: Why This Essay Works
- Clarity of Thesis: The opening paragraph addresses the issue and provides two reasons for working from home: productivity and cost efficiency.
- Illustration of Examples: Software Developer’s Example highlights how less noisy environment helps focus while not suggesting that remote work is good for everybody.
- Argumenting for Business Needs: Second body paragraph relates to lower office needs in terms of business priorities like training and product development.
- Counter-Argument with Solutions: Collaboration issues are recognized and some real-world solutions are suggested rather than rejecting an opposite point of view.
- Use of Transitions: Phrases like “First”, “Second”, “Admittedly”, “In Conclusion” allow following the essay without using too complex vocabulary.
Opinion Essay 2: Experience or Qualifications When Hiring?
The Prompt
When hiring new employees for managerial positions, some companies prioritize candidates with extensive practical work experience. Other organizations place greater value on high-level academic credentials and formal qualifications.
Which qualification do you consider more critical for managerial success? Explain your reasoning with relevant examples.
Strategic Brainstorming and Paragraph Plan
Position: Practical experience is generally more important for managerial success because it helps candidates apply knowledge, solve unexpected problems, and lead teams effectively.
| Paragraph | Main purpose | Supporting ideas |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Introduction | Introduce the debate and state your position | Experience over academic credentials |
| 2. Body 1 | Explain the value of practical problem-solving | Responding to supply disruptions, budget changes, and operational issues |
| 3. Body 2 | Explain the importance of people management | Resolving conflicts, motivating staff, and building trust |
| 4. Concession | Acknowledge the value of formal qualifications | Degrees provide analytical skills and foundational knowledge, but practical application is also necessary |
| 5. Conclusion | Reinforce your position | Experience helps managers apply knowledge in real working environments |
Model Essay (300+ Words)
Experience or Qualifications When Hiring?
When hiring employees for managerial positions, companies must decide how much weight to give to practical experience and formal academic qualifications. Although advanced degrees can provide valuable theoretical knowledge and analytical skills, I believe practical experience is generally more important because it helps managers solve unexpected problems and lead employees effectively.
First, experienced managers are often better prepared to handle operational challenges that cannot be fully anticipated in a classroom. Business situations can change quickly because of supply chain disruptions, budget constraints, or sudden staff shortages. In these circumstances, managers must assess the situation, prioritize tasks, and make decisions with limited time and information. For example, a plant manager who has worked in manufacturing for many years may recognize early signs of equipment problems and coordinate with maintenance staff before production is seriously affected. Although academic knowledge can help explain how operations should work, practical experience gives managers opportunities to apply that knowledge under real conditions.
Second, experience can help managers develop the interpersonal skills needed to lead a team. A manager may understand organizational behavior in theory but still find it difficult to resolve disagreements between colleagues or motivate employees during a stressful period. Through daily interactions, experienced leaders can learn how to listen to different perspectives, communicate expectations clearly, and address conflicts before they become more serious. For instance, a department manager who has previously guided a team through a demanding project may be better equipped to distribute workloads fairly and maintain morale when deadlines become tight. These abilities are important because managerial success depends not only on achieving business targets but also on helping employees work together effectively.
Admittedly, formal qualifications can provide a strong foundation in areas such as finance, strategy, and organizational management. They may also demonstrate a candidate’s ability to study complex subjects and analyze information systematically. However, academic knowledge alone does not guarantee that someone can apply these concepts effectively in a workplace. Managers still need practical judgment and experience to adapt general principles to specific business challenges.
In conclusion, although academic qualifications offer useful knowledge and analytical tools, I consider practical experience more critical for managerial success. By dealing with real operational problems and leading people over time, experienced managers can develop the judgment, adaptability, and communication skills needed to guide a team effectively.
Margin Notes: Why This Essay Works
- Clear position: The introduction favors practical experience and identifies two supporting reasons.
- Specific examples: The manufacturing scenario illustrates operational problem-solving, while the team-management example demonstrates leadership skills.
- Balanced argument: The essay recognizes the value of formal qualifications without abandoning its main position.
- Logical development: Each body paragraph focuses on one reason and explains how it contributes to managerial success.
- Appropriate language: The vocabulary is formal but readable, avoiding exaggerated claims that practical experience always outweighs academic knowledge.
How the Three Task Types Are Rated: Understanding the Official TOEIC Writing Criteria
Learning about the TOEIC Writing scoring guidelines will help you concentrate on what matters in the test: Task completion, clear communication, and using proper English. The TOEIC Writing questions 1-5, questions 6-7, and question 8 are evaluated according to separate rating scales and guidelines.
Below are two tables showing the difference between official ETS evaluation guidelines and LUME’s guidelines.
Scoring Criteria: Questions 6-7 (Scale: 0-4)
In TOEIC Writing Part 2, you respond to two written requests by composing email replies. Each response is rated on a scale of 0 to 4. According to ETS, the official evaluation criteria are:
- Quality and variety of sentences: How effectively you construct sentences to communicate your message.
- Vocabulary: Whether your word choices are appropriate and accurate.
- Organization: How clearly and logically you arrange the information in your response.
| Raw score | LUME’s practical interpretation |
|---|---|
| 4 | Responds appropriately to the request, addresses its key requirements, and presents ideas clearly. Sentence structures and vocabulary are varied and accurate, with strong organization. |
| 3 | Communicates the main message effectively, although some details, wording, or organizational choices may be less effective. Errors generally do not interfere with understanding. |
| 2 | Shows partial task fulfillment or limited development. Repetitive sentence structures, vocabulary problems, or organizational weaknesses may reduce clarity. |
| 1 | Provides very limited relevant content. Major language or organizational problems make the response difficult to understand. |
| 0 | Provides no meaningful scorable response, such as a blank, off-topic, or otherwise non-scorable answer. |
How to apply these criteria
- Address the specific requests in the prompt, including any required questions or requests for information.
- Employ different sentence structures whenever they work best for your thoughts.
- Grammar need not be complex, but it should support good expression of thought.
- Be natural and professional in your choice of words while organizing the email logically.
- Pay attention to spelling and punctuation while completing the task.

Improve your TOEIC Writing email replies by addressing every requirement in the prompt, varying your sentence structures, using natural professional language, and checking grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
Scoring Criteria: Question 8 (Scale: 0-5)
In Question 8, you will be required to produce an opinion essay using reasons and/or examples to back up your viewpoint. You have 30 minutes to brainstorm, draft, and edit your answer. ETS indicates that an effective essay will usually consist of at least 300 words.
The official evaluation criteria are:
- Support for your opinion: Whether you explain and support your position with relevant reasons and/or examples.
- Grammar: The accuracy and effectiveness of your grammatical choices.
- Vocabulary: The appropriateness and accuracy of your word choices.
- Organization: The clarity and logical arrangement of your ideas.
| Raw score | LUME’s practical interpretation |
|---|---|
| 5 | Presents a clear, well-supported position with relevant development. Grammar, vocabulary, and organization work together effectively to communicate the argument. |
| 4 | Presents a clear position with relevant support, although some reasoning or language choices may be less effective than others. |
| 3 | Communicates an understandable position, but development may be uneven, repetitive, or too general. Language and organization may show noticeable weaknesses. |
| 2 | Provides limited support for the position. Ideas may be poorly developed or organized, and language problems may interfere with clarity. |
| 1 | Offers very limited relevant content, with little sustained argument and substantial difficulty communicating ideas. |
| 0 | Provides no meaningful scorable response, such as a blank, off-topic, or otherwise non-scorable answer. |
How to apply these criteria
- State your position clearly: Answer the exact question in the introduction.
- Develop your reasons: Explain why each point supports your position rather than simply listing opinions.
- Use relevant examples: Illustrate your reasoning with plausible, specific situations.
- Organize the essay logically: Use paragraphs and transitions to show how your ideas connect.
- Prioritize accuracy and clarity: Varied sentence structures and a broad vocabulary can help, but unnecessary complexity can introduce errors.
How TOEIC Writing Raw Scores Convert to the Scaled Score
TOEIC Writing Test comprises eight questions categorized into three tasks. All responses receive scores using the appropriate scales, which are then statistically combined into an overall scaled score ranging from 0 to 200. The score conversion process is not a one-to-one conversion of the raw total score.
| Questions | Task | Rating scale | Maximum raw points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1–5 | Write a sentence based on a picture | 0–3 per question | 15 |
| 6–7 | Respond to a written request | 0–4 per question | 8 |
| 8 | Write an opinion essay | 0–5 | 5 |
| Total | 8 questions | — | 28 |
TOEIC Writing Score Ranges
The TOEIC Writing scaled score is reported from 0 to 200, in increments of 10. ETS describes what typical writers in each score range can do (TOEIC Score User Guide, Speaking & Writing):
| Scaled score | What ETS says typical writers can do |
|---|---|
| 200 and 170–190 | Respond successfully to all questions. |
| 140–160 | Weaker on an extended opinion, but successful at conveying straightforward information and writing sentences. |
| 110–130 and 90–100 | Not strong at supporting an opinion, but usually convey straightforward information and write sentences. |
| 70–80 and 50–60 | Cannot write an extended opinion, mostly unsuccessful at conveying information, some weakness in sentence formation. |
| 0–30 and 40 | Almost no ability to create English sentences. |
These ranges describe overall writing proficiency; they are not separate score bands assigned to individual questions.
Take the time to systematically practice with a reliable toeic writing test preparation framework, review your writing against the official rubrics, and leverage targeted feedback tools to turn your business English skills into verified high-scoring success.
Related practice resources
- TOEIC Test Format: Everything You Need to Know
- TOEIC Practice Test With Answer Key (Timed)
- TOEIC Cheat Sheet: Test Day Strategy by Part
|
Want to FINALLY Ace the TOEIC Test And Reach Your Goals? Get Your FREE Lume Account Today to Unlock… ✅ 10,000+ PRACTICE QUESTIONS with detailed answers ✅ FREE MOCK TESTS with fast & accurate AI scoring ✅ Get BETTER SCORES with a PERSONALIZED study plan (Limited seats available!) |
Practice TOEIC with Lume
AI-powered scoring, realistic mock tests, and smart feedback tailored to your target score.

